Friday, June 8, 2012

The Church, The Pedophiles, and the Filipino Party Tree


When I stepped onto the treadmill Monday morning the guy jogging next to me made some small talk, like people do whilst on treadmills.  “How was your weekend?” He asked.    
    
“Really good, actually!” I said.  “A friend of mine was ordained a Roman Catholic Priest up in Atlanta, so I went up and celebrated with him and some of my other friends.  It was really awesome.”
“Oh that’s cool!”
“Yeah!”  
“Did you tell him to stay away from little boys?”  
Stunned and deadpan.  “No.  I didn’t.”
...
I’ve recently been reading some CNN.com articles in a convenient effort to keep up with current events (Definitely open to other suggestions).  The Vatican has been making several appearances lately, what with Obama’s healthcare mandates, the leaky butler, and the renegade nuns (oxymoron) going back and forth with the Pope.  CNN’s rhetorically slanted coverage of these issues is frustrating enough, but then, for some reason I am always compelled to read the responses at the end.  Every single time, no matter what the issue is that’s being reported about the Catholic Church, more than one person makes a comment bringing it back to the pedophile priest scandals, and more than one other person makes a comment along the lines of, “Give it up, already...  The Catholic Church isn’t working anymore...  Nobody trusts the Vatican...  It’s time to hang it up...”  And my personal favorite of these comments: “You’ve had your time.  We call it ‘the Dark Ages’.” 
...
One particularly hot, summer day back in the 80’s, when I was about 5 years old, my Grandmother took me to this Filipino party somewhere out in the country.  Sometime after she had me stand on top of a table and sing a Whitney Houston song for everyone on the Karaoke machine, as per the usual, I went outside to find some other children to play with.  Usually at these Filipino parties there would be a bunch of children running around together somewhere, but here I didn’t see them right away.  (Don’t worry, this isn’t going to be a story about a pedophile.  It’s going to be about a tree).  Then, several yards away, I saw a couple of little kids run off and disappear into the leaves of this giant tree in the middle of a field.  (See?  I told you.)  I don’t know what kind of tree it was, maybe an oak, or a maple... I wasn’t really aware of these kinds of details at the age of 5, but it was huge, and dense, and it had branches all the way down to the ground.  After I saw a couple more children run across the field and disappear into the tree, I decided to head towards it and check the tree out for myself.
    
The closer I got to the tree, the bigger it seemed to become.  As I approached, the tree appeared animated and alive with voices and laughter; leaves rustling around in random places all over.  I was timid and a bit apprehensive, but entirely drawn and curious.  So I went in.     

When I crossed the threshold of the outer leafy boundary, it was like stepping through a doorway to a different world.  The temperature dropped significantly in the coolness of its shade.  Rays of sparkling light were pouring in through the leaves, twinkling with their rustling movements.  Everywhere I looked, up and around, there were dozens and dozens of other children playing happily on the branches.  It was the kind of climbing tree that children live for.  These branches were so strong, sturdy and close together that we could climb very high and still feel very safe.  There was a boy who was obviously “it”, trying to tag some other children, so I joined right in with a loud squeal. He came after me as I climbed away from him like a little monkey.  We all played for hours in that tree, climbing up and down and around, talking, exploring, having our own little party while the grown-ups did whatever it is that grown-ups do when they get together...  Who cares?      

Now here is where I bring up webworms.  I don’t know about other parts of the U.S., but anyone who’s lived in the Midwest has seen the work of these nasty little things.  They live on the outer branches of trees, and you know they’re present when it looks like some dirty, flavorless cotton candy has attacked a tree branch and they both died in the battle.  Dirty, dead cotton candy on a dead tree branch.  Got it?  It’s actually really gross.  Depending on how many branches are affected, an infestation can make your trees look hideous.    
    
Now, let’s say for a moment that the Filipino party tree had webworms too.  Even though it didn’t in real life, it is not a far stretch of the imagination.  After all, it’s a great tree, which makes it very vulnerable to bugs that eat yummy trees.  Let’s even say that it had so many webworms, it appeared to be dying.  Looking at it from a distance, I would have seen the webworm damage and devastation caused to some of the more visible parts of the branches, and I might have figured the tree itself was sick and in the early stages of decay.  But here is the point: The little moth larvae we call webworms are not the tree itself.  They are the worms; the tree is still the tree.  And it is not going anywhere.  Webworms can’t kill a tree this strong.      
    
Standing outside of the Church and looking at her from a distance, especially with the slanted voices of misinformed skeptics explaining the circumstances in our ears, there is reason to be alarmed and somewhat grossed-out.  I have spent most of my life seeing it from this angle, so I understand.  But now, I have disappeared into the leaves with the other children who play in its expansive shade mixed with sparkling light.  I am currently sitting on a branch with my back resting against its massive trunk.  From this angle, it is not at all what you would have expected from the outside.  The closer we get to the center—which is the real presence of Jesus Christ himself—and the more time we spend observing the world from there, the more we are able to distinguish the Tree itself from the worms and know that they are not one in the same.  As we climb the branches, we learn to trust the strength of the real thing, and stay clear of the flavorless cotton candy-looking stuff.  We observe with curiosity and wonder the markings that tell the story of the Tree’s growth throughout her long history of becoming such a Tree.  Here, wind knocked off a branch.  There, lightening must have struck the side of the trunk many years ago.  Look, an owl must have lived in this hole at some point, or a family of squirrels.  “Tag!  You’re it!”  We grow to love the Tree itself and desire that she be free from the worms that plague her.  There is damage done, and some branches have been ruined, which is a grievous loss.  But it’s not the end of the Tree.  She is very much alive and well.  It is simply a time that requires intense pruning, which, as anyone who knows anything about trees can tell you, will only make her living branches stronger in time.      
    
It’s strange for the children to sometimes hear people observing from the outside refer to their Tree as “That dying webworm tree.”  We know that doesn’t even make sense.  These are only the voices of ones who have no idea just how deep these roots go, how much they have survived already, and the strength of the branches that hold the children up and keep them from being afraid.  The webworms will be done away with in time.  No doubt, more may come, and they will go as well.  But the Tree will remain right where she is, with children playing in her branches until the day has ended and the children are called to go home.  
“...and behold, I am with you always, to the close of the age.”  Matthew 28:20

10 comments:

  1. nice and deep reflection Tina...I agree with the many points you have written here...and I can only pray that people which as you put it "observing from the outside", will be touched by the Holy Spirit to get in and see it from the inside...and while they stand from the outside, that they should wonder why despite of centuries of attacks and criticisms and protests, the four pillars of the Catholic church remained as strong as it is then til now? Because, it is Christ Himself who founded this church, and Christ is the very heart of it...God bless you. You are gifted by the Spirit, may you touch many many lives!

    ReplyDelete
  2. great story! love, jenai

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks Jenai and Auntie Jo! Love you guys!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The only issue I see is that the "tree" is not a perfect institution. A tree is a tree. The Church is the bride of Christ and the Pope is the infallible head of that institution. Now I understand that the Pope isn't without fault. He's a person...he's human. I also understand that Priests are people affected by the same sins and misgivings as the rest of us.

    The problem arises when Bishops and Cardinals are aware of abuse and the assault on the innocence of children and don't do anything to stop it. Instead of stopping the abuse, they encourage and endorse the abuse of other children by moving pedophile priests to other parishes. Did the Pope know about what was going on in Philadelphia, Boston, America? We don't know, but it's safe to assume that if a Cardinal is aware of the situation then the Vatican must know too. If the Vatican knows, then so does the Pope.

    The Church didn't do the moral, just or Christian thing when children were being horribly victimized by trusted members of the Cloth. The Church HID THE MOLESTERS. The Church allowed it to happen again and again and again. St Augustine theorized that war was just in the right circumstance, and that death in war was just. The Vatican should have approached this assault on innocence as a war on the Church and dealt with it accordingly.

    The Tree has no control over whether the webworm infests it. The Pope had a choice. At the first sign of evil, he could have nipped every infested branch (Priest) that had been involved. He could have turned them over to law enforcement within their respective countries. He could have immediately offered love and support to the victims. He could have promised that no pedophile priest would ever again hide inside the Church. He didn't. The Vatican finally just held a conference on the impact the abuse scandal had on the victims in February. I was in Rome when the Bishops were there. Unfortunately, it was too late. Instead of the Church consoling 10, 25, or 50 victims, they must now deal with thousands of children that had their innocence stolen because the Church was slow to act. It acted selfishly by trying to hide sins. I'm not saying that there should never again be a Priest that does wrong, but the Holy Roman Catholic Church should not allow those Priest the ability to continue their wrongs.

    I'm not a arm chair critic that gets my view of the Catholic faith from CNN. I'm not Catholic, but I've attended Mass, consistently, since 1997...Holy Days of Obligation and all. The Church must stop projecting its moral compass on the world until it gets its own morality under control. John 8:7 is important because as Christ's church, the Vatican has a moral and Christian obligation to act as Christ. The Church must stop casting stones on the world's moral problems because it is not without sin. The Vatican can't have its cake and eat it too. It must get right within the confines of the principles set forth by Jesus, St. Peter, St. Mary, St. Paul, et al and then it can again acts as a guiding light for what is true and moral. Until then, the Church is nothing more than the pinnacle of hypocrisy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you, Chris, for sharing this. I know many would have similar responses, but would not take the time to voice them here, but this is good dialogue to help understand these issues and what is really going on here. No doubt, it is a difficult, heartbreaking, infuriating issue for the whole world, and especially for those who love the Church and are still devoted in faith. Or those who would be devoted if it weren't for this crap. So it's so good to talk about it and try to bring light to the issue.

    What your argument fails to recognize is the essential distinction which is the purpose of the tree analogy. It’s the distinction between the essential Church and those appointed to lead the Church. I know it can be a challenging distinction to make, but someone once explained to me that if you want to understand the history of the Catholic Church, don’t study the popes, study the lives of the Saints. The Church herself is still perfect and always will be, but the collection of leaders have never been totally innocent. Even at the Last Supper when Jesus instituted Holy Orders, he still included Judas, even though He had just said that Judas would betray Him. Why didn’t He kick him out before making them the first priests/bishops? I don’t know, that’s beyond my ability to understand at this point, but it helps me understand where we’re at now. Ever since then, some bishops and popes have become Saints, others have been completely scandalous in betraying Christ. Perhaps he kept Judas present because He knew the Church would never be rid of Judas entirely, but even so, the sacraments themselves are still perfect. Just my theory. It is definitely a complex issue and we can talk much more about it, plus I would like others to weigh in, because I'm sure others can explain it better than I can. I do think progress starts with understanding that priests and Bishops have a role in the Church, but they are not the definition of the Church itself. The Church is something far bigger and more essential than the sum of the leadership, though, again they have an extremely important role, obviously.

    Also, in your line of reasoning you have made several assumptions about the role of the Pope in this scandal, beginning with the fact that the Bishops actually told the Pope right away, and therefore, he was aware. Why is that safe to assume? I find it much more likely that the Bishops involved were hiding the scandal, (and as a result, perpetuating it) not so much from us, because they didn’t want us to know, but because they didn’t want the Pope to find out. He was probably the last person they would tell, and the main person they were concealing it from. I imagine they probably never told him, someone else did.

    I have a few friends who have recently become priests and so through them, I’ve learned a bit about the measures the Church has taken as a result of this huge travesty to try to make sure it doesn’t happen anymore. All the psychological tests they have to take and new rules they have to follow, including not being alone with kids. I pray for justice in the situation and that if my own anger is any reflection of the righteous anger of God, then I pray that vengance come down on those who have unleashed it. I rarely pray such a thing, but this case calls for that kind of justice, I think. But even in the face of this darkness, and with the present of some corrupt leaders who are meant to protect the Church, and instead do her injustice, I still have faith that the Church remains the Spotless Bride of Christ, in spite of everything.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Popes aren't "appointed". They are chosen by the Holy Spirit. They are the Apostolic descendants of St Peter.

    "I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."

    The Pope doesn't get the liberty of shirking responsibility. In matters of the Church, he must be connected to every branch of his tree. Even the ones infected with webworms. The innocence of the Church and those children that were abused have been lost on earth and "shall be loosed in Heaven." That innocence can never be returned. It's lost...

    Please don't mistake my criticism of the Church as having my head in the sand and thinking that men will never do wrong under the guise of Christianity. I know that Popes and Priests are people and, as such, must live within the human condition...their imperfectness, but there are nearly 3 decades of abuse that the Church has been complicit in. Yes....the Pope was probably kept from the truth by prideful men embarrassed by sinners in their flock. Cardinal Bevilacqua and his aide didn't act to protect their flock out of pride.(http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/23/us/philadelphias-msgr-william-j-lynn-is-convicted-of-allowing-abuse.html?pagewanted=all). He was a member of the College of Cardinals. The Pope is the Holy See and to think that he's oblivious to what his Cardinals are doing is egregious and it's a travesty to the Holiness of The Church. Maybe Pope John Paul II was kept in the dark for the length of his Papacy. Doubtful, but I'll give him the benefit. Cardinal Ratzinger was the Dean of the College of Cardinals, Head of the Roman Curia, leader of Doctrinal Faith. Pope Benedict XVI has made a stand against the pacification of "moral truth". If so, then why didn't he immediately take action against the pedophile priests upon his coronation at Pope Benedict XVI? He had to know or had heard rumblings of abuse. He was too connected to the daily operations of the Church to be kept in the dark. Now, he's the Pope...the direct descendant of St Peter...he was selected by the Holy Spirit during the Conclave in the Holiest place I've ever been. He's infallible....He's responsible. He's also human and knows that if he gave his full cooperation to punishing the pedophiles it would open the Church to financial ruin. If Pope Benedict XVI made full disclosure through Church documents about hiding pedophiles, juries would award the victims huge financial settlements. The Church has vast resources, but they're not endless and such financial responsibility could spell ruin for a 2000 year old institution.

    You say that the Church is "far bigger and more essential than the sum of the leadership". There is no Church without it though. We must sit in the pews, Priests must stand at the alter, and the Pope must be the Bishop of Rome. Without all those things, there is no congregation...no flock. The Church cannot be separate from faithful. There is no transubstantiation without Priests. There is no body without the Host. There is no blood without the fruit of the vine. The wheat and fruit don't grow without man tending the fields. They are interconnected and have been since the Last Supper. Jesus knew the importance of people being the center of the Church which is why it is built (and passed on) on the shoulders of Men.

    That's why Popes don't get a pass "because they didn't know".

    ReplyDelete
  7. Part I:

    First of all, I'm so glad that you chose that verse to bring into the discussion. It's perfect, and I'll get to that in a minute. We are in agreement that the Pope is infallible, that he has to connect to and govern the whole global Church, that the Church is reliant on leadership (the Magesterium), and that there is no transubstantiation without our Priests. So true!

    (Also, gregarious is a great word. Nice choice.)

    I think that the core of the misunderstanding here, though, is the concept of Papal Infallibility and what it actually means and doesn't mean. The Pope's infallibility has to do with instructing the Church on issues of faith and morals when he's speaking "Ex Cathedra", or "from the chair". It has nothing to do with how awesome of a leader the man himself is, but it is an particularly awesome gift of the Holy Spirit given to Peter's successors to protect the Church from teaching and believing incorrectly about faith and morals, specifically. It has actually been several decades since any Pope has exercised papal infallibility, because they only do it when it is absolutely necessary to bring clarity to a disputed issue. There is a really great book about Papal Infallibility called "Pope Fiction" which I highly recommend for understanding the role of the Pope and the gift of infallibility. It has some minor grammatical typos here and there, but the explanations are very solid and I found the whole concept and history of infallibility truly fascinating.

    About the innocence of the Church and the victims of the scandal: They are violated, but being violated does not make them guilty. They are not held morally responsible for the sin of the predators. Their souls are innocent of the crime committed against them. Binding and loosing in heaven and on earth is also related to the Pope and to Holy Orders, of course, but not in the context in which you just used it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Part II:

    I read the article you attached, and here's the thing: It's an article from the New York Times, yes? When you told me that you don't get your views on the Catholic faith from CNN, I assumed that CNN represented all liberal media sources. If you're going to cite a liberal news source like that to support your case, I'm sorry to say that you're really only supporting mine. Don't get me wrong, I think it's fine to read these things to know how others are viewing these issues. I often do. But these sources are not at all objective and unbiased. The present issues that affect the Church without truly understanding the Church, so how can they know it's implications in our context? I don't want to go off on a discursive rhetorical analysis of this particular article and its choice of words, but it casts a light that claims to be plain white light, but is actually more greenish-yellow or something. Do you read any Catholic commentary on these same current events? What do these sources, (ones that do understand what Catholicism is and how it works) have to say about how this particular trial affects the Church?

    And now, about that awesome scripture verse you quoted, which brings us back to the original blog. My whole tree analogy goes back to this very verse, particularly that is says, "And the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." Oh man, that gives me chills! That is exactly what I'm trying to say! Pay super close attention to Jesus' words here. Notice how He refers to Peter as "you" and the Church as "it". There is an important relationship and dependency between the two, but also a distinction. "YOU are Peter(Rock), and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against IT." YES!!! See? That is why I can say with confidence that the Church is distinct from corruption and is still perfect no matter how imperfect the leadership can be at times. The Church, the spiritual entity herself, is not going to lose her integrity and fall apart, even if the Bishops lose their integrity and fall apart, though I pray they do not! It's definitely much better if they do not! And they need our prayers. But regardless, the Church is what she is until Jesus comes back. You just reminded me that He said so Himself. Thank you for the supporting evidence to back up my initial claim.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I had to break that up into two parts because the comment box made me! It was too long! If you read all that, I will be truly impressed. :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Awesome explanation and analogy Christina! Pope Benedict said something similar about stained glass windows when he was in NY at ST Patrick's Cathedral. From the outside it looks dark and colorless, kind of dreary. But on the inside the brilliance and beauty of the windows is very apparent.

    Fr Mikey

    ReplyDelete